Short answer: agree on the criteria, the rubric and the timeline before the ad goes up, and post in August or September. Score every application against the same rubric with two readers, ask every candidate the same core questions, and keep candidates informed at each stage. Most faculty searches hold first-round interviews from November to January and campus visits from January to March, and make offers between February and April. The checklist below covers every step, from approval to the debrief.
By the AcademicCareers.com editorial team · Updated October 14, 2026 · 11-minute read
A faculty search at a glance
In this guide
Settle who does what before the first meeting. Three to five voting members is a workable size: enough perspectives to judge fairly, small enough to schedule.
Agree on confidentiality and conflicts of interest at the start. A member who supervised, co-authored with or is close to an applicant should say so, and the committee should decide whether that member steps back from evaluating that person.
Fall faculty searches follow the academic calendar. Fix the dates before the ad goes up and put the review date in the ad. Before writing it, read a few current tenure-track listings to see how other departments describe similar positions, and see how to write a faculty job ad.
| Phase | When | What the committee produces |
|---|---|---|
| Approvals, committee and ad | Summer; post in August or September | Approved position and salary range, rubric, ad and advertising plan |
| Review of applications | October and November | Scored files and a long list |
| First-round interviews | November to January | A short list of two to four finalists |
| Campus visits | January to March | Structured feedback and a ranked recommendation |
| References and offer | February to April | A signed offer letter |
| Closing the search | Within two weeks of acceptance | Every candidate notified, records filed, debrief held |
Strong candidates may hold other offers by early spring, so a gap of weeks between steps can cost you your first choice. The academic hiring calendar shows how the season unfolds month by month. Use the checklist to keep the search moving.
Work through the search phase by phase. Share the page with the committee so everyone works from the same list.
Before the ad
The ad
Screening
First-round interviews
Campus visits
References and offer
Closing the search
Your ticks are saved in this browser.
A rubric turns the ad into a scoring sheet, so every reader judges every file on the same criteria. Build it from the required and preferred qualifications in the ad, agree on weights, and test it on three or four files together before scoring the rest.
| Criterion | Weight | Strong (3) | Adequate (2) | Limited (1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Required qualifications | Pass or fail | Degree in the field, or completion by the start date | n/a | Not met: stop here |
| Teaching | 30% | Has taught relevant courses, with evidence that students learned | Some teaching; a general statement | Little evidence |
| Research or creative work | 30% | Active record and a plan that fits the department's resources | Promising but early, or less aligned | No clear agenda |
| Curriculum fit | 20% | Can teach the advertised courses and add one the department needs | Can teach most advertised courses | Little overlap |
| Mentoring and service | 20% | Specific record of advising, mentoring or service | Some involvement | None described |
Score independently first, then discuss. Record a short reason for each score, and be wary of "fit" without a definition: if it matters, write down what it means, as the curriculum row does.
If the pool is thin or narrow at the review date, extend the outreach rather than lower the bar. See where to advertise faculty jobs for channels to add.
First round. Give every candidate a video interview of the same length, with the same core questions in the same order. Send the format, the committee's names and the link in advance, test the platform, and score each interview before the committee discusses it.
Campus visits. Invite two to four finalists. A typical visit includes a research talk or teaching demonstration, meetings with students and faculty, and time with the chair and the dean. Send the schedule early, book and pay for travel directly so candidates don't front the costs, and name a host who keeps the day on time. Collect a short structured feedback form from every group that meets a candidate.
Accessibility. Ask every candidate in the invitation whether they need accommodations, in the same words for all. Under the laws the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission enforces, an employer must provide a reasonable accommodation to an applicant with a disability unless it would cause significant difficulty or expense. In practice that means accessible rooms and routes, materials in advance, captions for video interviews, breaks in a long day and attention to dietary needs.
Federal law bars discrimination in hiring based on race, color, religion, sex (including pregnancy, sexual orientation and transgender status), national origin, age (40 or older), disability and genetic information. The EEOC advises limiting pre-employment questions to what is needed to judge whether a person is qualified, and employers may not ask about disability before an offer. Ask HR about any added protections under your state's law.
If your institution is religiously affiliated, ask counsel what your mission-related hiring policies allow. This is general information, not legal advice.
Short, prompt messages protect your reputation with every applicant, not only the finalists. Adapt these, filling in the bracketed parts:
Acknowledgment. Thank you for applying for the position of [assistant professor of chemistry] at [institution]. The committee will begin reviewing applications on [November 1], and we expect to contact candidates about next steps by [mid-December]. If you have questions in the meantime, please write to [coordinator's name and e-mail].
Decline after screening. Thank you for your interest in the position of [title] and for the time you put into your application. After careful review, the committee has decided not to advance your application. We appreciate your interest in [institution] and wish you every success in your search.
Decline after a campus visit (from the chair, ideally by phone first). Thank you for visiting [institution] and for the care you put into your talk and meetings. The committee has offered the position to another candidate, who has accepted. It was a difficult decision, and we enjoyed getting to know you.
Timeline update. The search for [title] is taking longer than we planned. We now expect to contact candidates by [date]. Thank you for your patience.
Send declines as soon as a candidate is out of consideration. Keep your strongest backups informed until an offer is accepted.
Hold a debrief. Within a month of the acceptance, meet for half an hour and answer five questions. Where did the applicants and finalists come from? Where did the search lose time? Did the rubric work? How did candidates experience the visit? What will we change next time? Ask the new hire too, once they have started.
Advertise your faculty search
A $295 AcademicCareers.com posting stays up for 90 days, featured in search results and sent to job seekers whose alerts match. You can also e-mail the ad to Info@AcademicCareersOnline.com and staff post it for you.
See prices and bundlesUnlimited Annual PlansMost of an academic year. Fall searches post in August or September, hold first-round interviews from November to January and campus visits from January to March, and make offers between February and April.
Three to five voting members is a workable size: enough perspectives to judge fairly, small enough to schedule. Add a staff coordinator for logistics and records.
Usually two to four, so the committee has a real choice and a backup if the first choice declines.
Avoid questions about age, marriage, children or family plans, religion, national origin, and health or disability. Ask every candidate the same job-related questions, and brief everyone who meets candidates.
Yes. It lets every reader compare candidates on the same criteria and documents how decisions were made. Agree on it before the first application is read.
Yes, promptly and at every stage. A short, courteous message protects your institution's reputation with people who may apply again, or who will talk to colleagues about how the search was run.