Blog > Faculty Recruitment

A Faculty Search Committee Checklist

A Faculty Search Committee Checklist

Short answer: agree on the criteria, the rubric and the timeline before the ad goes up, and post in August or September. Score every application against the same rubric with two readers, ask every candidate the same core questions, and keep candidates informed at each stage. Most faculty searches hold first-round interviews from November to January and campus visits from January to March, and make offers between February and April. The checklist below covers every step, from approval to the debrief.

By the AcademicCareers.com editorial team · Updated October 14, 2026 · 11-minute read

A faculty search at a glance

  • August to April the usual span from posting to offer for a fall faculty search
  • 2 readers per application, scoring against a rubric agreed before the first file is opened
  • 2 to 4 finalists invited to campus, so the committee has a real choice and a backup
  • Same questions for every candidate, and none about age, family or religion
  • 38 steps in the interactive checklist, from approvals to the debrief

Roles on the committee

Settle who does what before the first meeting. Three to five voting members is a workable size: enough perspectives to judge fairly, small enough to schedule.

  • Chair. Runs the process, keeps the timeline, speaks for the committee and makes sure every candidate is treated the same way.
  • Members. Read and score applications, interview and attend talks. Include at least one person from outside the immediate subfield.
  • Search coordinator. Usually a staff member who handles the applicant tracking system, acknowledgments, scheduling, travel and records.
  • Human resources or the equity office. Advises on required training, documentation and compliance, and reviews the ad.
  • Dean or provost. Approves the position and salary range, and authorizes the offer.

Agree on confidentiality and conflicts of interest at the start. A member who supervised, co-authored with or is close to an applicant should say so, and the committee should decide whether that member steps back from evaluating that person.

The search timeline

Fall faculty searches follow the academic calendar. Fix the dates before the ad goes up and put the review date in the ad. Before writing it, read a few current tenure-track listings to see how other departments describe similar positions, and see how to write a faculty job ad.

Typical timeline for a fall faculty search. Staff and adjunct searches usually move much faster.
PhaseWhenWhat the committee produces
Approvals, committee and adSummer; post in August or SeptemberApproved position and salary range, rubric, ad and advertising plan
Review of applicationsOctober and NovemberScored files and a long list
First-round interviewsNovember to JanuaryA short list of two to four finalists
Campus visitsJanuary to MarchStructured feedback and a ranked recommendation
References and offerFebruary to AprilA signed offer letter
Closing the searchWithin two weeks of acceptanceEvery candidate notified, records filed, debrief held

Strong candidates may hold other offers by early spring, so a gap of weeks between steps can cost you your first choice. The academic hiring calendar shows how the season unfolds month by month. Use the checklist to keep the search moving.

Interactive

Faculty search checklist

Work through the search phase by phase. Share the page with the committee so everyone works from the same list.

0 of 38 done

Before the ad

The ad

Screening

First-round interviews

Campus visits

References and offer

Closing the search

Your ticks are saved in this browser.

Agree on a rubric before you read

A rubric turns the ad into a scoring sheet, so every reader judges every file on the same criteria. Build it from the required and preferred qualifications in the ad, agree on weights, and test it on three or four files together before scoring the rest.

Sample rubric for a fictional assistant professor search at a teaching-focused university. Adjust the criteria and weights to your ad.
CriterionWeightStrong (3)Adequate (2)Limited (1)
Required qualificationsPass or failDegree in the field, or completion by the start daten/aNot met: stop here
Teaching30%Has taught relevant courses, with evidence that students learnedSome teaching; a general statementLittle evidence
Research or creative work30%Active record and a plan that fits the department's resourcesPromising but early, or less alignedNo clear agenda
Curriculum fit20%Can teach the advertised courses and add one the department needsCan teach most advertised coursesLittle overlap
Mentoring and service20%Specific record of advising, mentoring or serviceSome involvementNone described

Score independently first, then discuss. Record a short reason for each score, and be wary of "fit" without a definition: if it matters, write down what it means, as the curriculum row does.

Screening applications fairly

  • Required qualifications first. Check them as pass or fail before anyone scores the rest of the file.
  • Two readers per file. Every application gets at least two independent scores; discuss files where the scores differ by more than a point.
  • Read for evidence. Decide in advance which documents count for which criteria, and don't let the prestige of a degree stand in for the evidence the rubric asks for.
  • Record reasons for advancing or declining each candidate, in a sentence or two.
  • Keep candidates informed. Acknowledge each application within a few days and say when to expect news.

If the pool is thin or narrow at the review date, extend the outreach rather than lower the bar. See where to advertise faculty jobs for channels to add.

First-round interviews and campus visits

First round. Give every candidate a video interview of the same length, with the same core questions in the same order. Send the format, the committee's names and the link in advance, test the platform, and score each interview before the committee discusses it.

Campus visits. Invite two to four finalists. A typical visit includes a research talk or teaching demonstration, meetings with students and faculty, and time with the chair and the dean. Send the schedule early, book and pay for travel directly so candidates don't front the costs, and name a host who keeps the day on time. Collect a short structured feedback form from every group that meets a candidate.

Accessibility. Ask every candidate in the invitation whether they need accommodations, in the same words for all. Under the laws the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission enforces, an employer must provide a reasonable accommodation to an applicant with a disability unless it would cause significant difficulty or expense. In practice that means accessible rooms and routes, materials in advance, captions for video interviews, breaks in a long day and attention to dietary needs.

Federal law bars discrimination in hiring based on race, color, religion, sex (including pregnancy, sexual orientation and transgender status), national origin, age (40 or older), disability and genetic information. The EEOC advises limiting pre-employment questions to what is needed to judge whether a person is qualified, and employers may not ask about disability before an offer. Ask HR about any added protections under your state's law.

  • Ask every candidate the same job-related questions, and take notes on answers, not on personal impressions.
  • Don't ask about age, birth dates or retirement plans.
  • Don't ask about family: marriage, partners, children, pregnancy or plans to have children. If a candidate raises a partner's job search, point them to your dual-career resources and leave it out of the evaluation.
  • Don't ask about religion or about national origin. If you need to know about visa sponsorship, ask every finalist the same question, in wording HR provides.
  • Don't ask about health or disability. Describe the duties and schedule to every candidate in the same way.
  • Brief everyone who meets candidates, including students and dinner hosts; informal conversations count too.

If your institution is religiously affiliated, ask counsel what your mission-related hiring policies allow. This is general information, not legal advice.

Candidate communication templates

Short, prompt messages protect your reputation with every applicant, not only the finalists. Adapt these, filling in the bracketed parts:

Acknowledgment. Thank you for applying for the position of [assistant professor of chemistry] at [institution]. The committee will begin reviewing applications on [November 1], and we expect to contact candidates about next steps by [mid-December]. If you have questions in the meantime, please write to [coordinator's name and e-mail].

Decline after screening. Thank you for your interest in the position of [title] and for the time you put into your application. After careful review, the committee has decided not to advance your application. We appreciate your interest in [institution] and wish you every success in your search.

Decline after a campus visit (from the chair, ideally by phone first). Thank you for visiting [institution] and for the care you put into your talk and meetings. The committee has offered the position to another candidate, who has accepted. It was a difficult decision, and we enjoyed getting to know you.

Timeline update. The search for [title] is taking longer than we planned. We now expect to contact candidates by [date]. Thank you for your patience.

Send declines as soon as a candidate is out of consideration. Keep your strongest backups informed until an offer is accepted.

References, the offer and the debrief

  • References. Ask each finalist's referees the same questions, and get the candidate's permission before contacting anyone not on their list.
  • Recommendation. Give the chair or dean a ranked list with reasons drawn from the rubric and the feedback forms.
  • The offer. Move quickly, and put everything agreed in writing: salary, start date, teaching load and course releases, start-up funds, moving expenses and the response deadline.
  • Closing. Notify every remaining candidate, take down every posting and file the records your institution requires.

Hold a debrief. Within a month of the acceptance, meet for half an hour and answer five questions. Where did the applicants and finalists come from? Where did the search lose time? Did the rubric work? How did candidates experience the visit? What will we change next time? Ask the new hire too, once they have started.

Common pitfalls

  • Weeks of silence that send strong candidates elsewhere
  • Changing the criteria part way through the search
  • Unstructured interviews that make candidates hard to compare
  • "Fit" standing in for criteria nobody wrote down
  • Candidates' names leaking before the campus visit stage
  • A posting that expires before the review date
  • A slow offer, or terms agreed by phone that never reach the letter

Advertise your faculty search

A $295 AcademicCareers.com posting stays up for 90 days, featured in search results and sent to job seekers whose alerts match. You can also e-mail the ad to Info@AcademicCareersOnline.com and staff post it for you.

See prices and bundlesUnlimited Annual Plans

Frequently asked questions

How long does a faculty search take?

Most of an academic year. Fall searches post in August or September, hold first-round interviews from November to January and campus visits from January to March, and make offers between February and April.

How many people should serve on a faculty search committee?

Three to five voting members is a workable size: enough perspectives to judge fairly, small enough to schedule. Add a staff coordinator for logistics and records.

How many candidates should we bring to campus?

Usually two to four, so the committee has a real choice and a backup if the first choice declines.

What questions can't we ask in a faculty interview?

Avoid questions about age, marriage, children or family plans, religion, national origin, and health or disability. Ask every candidate the same job-related questions, and brief everyone who meets candidates.

Do we need a scoring rubric?

Yes. It lets every reader compare candidates on the same criteria and documents how decisions were made. Agree on it before the first application is read.

Should we tell candidates they were not selected?

Yes, promptly and at every stage. A short, courteous message protects your institution's reputation with people who may apply again, or who will talk to colleagues about how the search was run.

Sources

  • U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Prohibited Employment Policies/Practices: application and hiring, reasonable accommodation and pre-employment inquiries (link)
  • Search timeline: AcademicCareers.com, The Academic Hiring Calendar (link)